In this episode of Semaphore Uncut, we chat with Jonathan Reimerâfounder of Crowd.dev, long-time open source startup operator, and now VP of Outbound Products at the Linux Foundation.
Jonathan shares his journey from building a data platform used by hundreds of developer-first companies, to joining the Linux Foundation through acquisition, and his latest focus: how open source business models, ecosystem dynamics, and rapidly advancing AI tooling are reshaping developer workflowsâand the future of software delivery.
Disclaimer: This interview was recorded in May 2025.
From Open Source Startups to Crowd.dev
Jonathan has spent his entire career inside open source companies. Four years ago, he founded Crowd.dev, a platform built around a challenge nearly every OSS startup faces:
âDevelopers adopt your project bottom-up, but you often have no idea who is using it or which companies are evaluating it.â
Crowd.dev unified signals across the entire developer ecosystem:
- GitHub stars, issues, and contributors
- Twitter/X and Reddit engagement
- Newsletter and community activity
- CRM and product usage data
By consolidating these touchpoints, teams could finally understand which accounts were showing real intent, where community traction was forming, and when to trigger sales outreach.
This visibility is essential for dev-first PLG motionsâespecially when the first âuserâ is often a developer inside a Fortune 500 company.
Joining the Linux Foundation
The Linux Foundation quickly became Crowd.devâs largest customer. With 1,000+ open source projects across 60+ sub-foundations, they needed deeper insight into:
- Who is engaging with each project
- Which companies are participating
- How fast each ecosystem is growing
Jonathan explains:
âRolling this out across the Linux Foundation meant dealing with enormous data volumes and technical complexity. At some point it became clear the product had to live inside the Foundation.â
Crowd.dev was acquired a year ago, and Jonathan now leads outbound products across the Linux Foundationâs broad OSS landscapeâfrom CNCF to new AI & Data initiatives.
The Three Types of Open Source Companies
After interviewing 400â500 founders, Jonathan sees open source startups falling into three categories:
1. Hobby Projects that Become Businesses
A developer builds something useful, it blows up, and only later becomes a company.
2. Strategic OSS Companies
Founders deliberately target markets to commoditizeâan approach that accelerated around 2018â2019.
3. Ecosystem Builders
Teams build proprietary services on top of major OSS platforms (like Kubernetes) where the underlying project is maintained elsewhere (often by Big Tech).
Each category has success storiesâand graveyards. Kubernetes, for example, spawned hundreds of startups, but many struggled as cloud providers âfeaturizedâ their offerings and commoditized entire product lines.
What Metrics Actually Matter?
GitHub stars? Helpful but misleading.
âStars are intent signalsâbut theyâre still a vanity metric.â
Instead, Jonathan recommends tracking Google Search Volume for your projectâs name:
- Easy to measure
- Difficult to game
- Strongly correlated with real adoption
Once a project reaches ~100â200 monthly searches, the curve tends to map to genuine community growth.
When Does Open Source Make Business Sense?
Jonathan gives founders two critical âcheckmarksâ:
1. A Large Existing Market
Open source works best when competing with established, high-cost toolsânot when creating categories from scratch.
2. Developers Must Be the Primary User
If your buyer is a marketer, salesperson, or operations team, open source loses many of its distribution advantages.
Developer-first companies, however, have a clear monetization path:
- Managed SaaS
- Enterprise support
- Consulting
- Multi-tenant hosting
- Compliance & risk management
âOpen source gets you into the building. Developers will bring your product into Fortune 500 companies.â
The Open Source + AI Intersection
Jonathan is still forming his conclusionsâbut he sees both opportunity and risk.
On one side, AI may make it easier for teams to build internal tools that replace lightweight OSS solutions. On the other, LLMs are trained heavily on open source code, and AI dramatically expands the number of people who can build software:
âWe used to have 20â25 million developers. I wouldnât be surprised if weâre heading toward 100 million people writing software with AI.â
AI is already accelerating open source activity: simple bug fixes, issue triage, and doc updates are increasingly automated. Complex systems (like the Linux kernel) remain far beyond current capabilitiesâbut not forever.
Proprietary Models vs Open Source Models
Jonathanâs prediction is bold:
Open source AI will win at the model layer.
Why?
- LLMs (e.g., DeepSeek, Llama) are rapidly commoditizing
- Switching between models is trivial
- Pricesâand marginsâare falling fast
- Real value moves to the application and data layers
âThe model layer is being commoditized. The value will be in proprietary data, customer access, and applications.â
Companies like OpenAI and Anthropic will remain strong due to enterprise distribution, but widespread adoption will favor accessible OSS models.
And hosting?
Running models on-prem or even at home is already commonâsomething unimaginable just a year ago.
Darko recalls a moment:
Reviewing their full codebase with an LLM used to cost $7â8k. Now it’s within reachâor can be run locally.
Follow Jonathan Reimer
đ Website: https://rymer.me
đŚ Twitter/X: @jonathimer
đź LinkedIn: Jonathan Reimer
