Compare / Semaphore vs CircleCI
Semaphore vs CircleCI
CircleCI offers many execution environments and configuration options. Semaphore focuses on fast builds, direct per-minute pricing and built-in debugging. Your repositories stay where they are.
TL;DR
- Average build time: 5m 01s on Semaphore vs 13m 18s on CircleCI. Cost per job: $0.04 vs $0.08.
- Direct per-minute pricing instead of credits.
- Pipeline as code plus a visual editor. No Orbs to audit.
- Real-time logs and SSH into running jobs.
- CircleCI fits better if your pipelines rely heavily on Orbs (details).
At a glance
| Semaphore | CircleCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Average build time | 5m 01s | 13m 18s |
| Cost per job | $0.04 | $0.08 |
| Billing | Direct per-minute pricing | Credit-based pricing |
| Configuration | Pipeline as code plus a visual editor | config.yml, Orbs and parameters |
| Deployment | Cloud, open-source Community Edition, Enterprise | Cloud plus self-hosted runners |
| Debugging | Real-time logs, SSH into jobs | Logs, reruns and executor tooling |
| Test signals | Test reports, flaky-test detection | Test results, test splitting, parallelism |
| Coding agents | MCP server, sem-ai CLI, agent plugins | Agent-assisted configuration |
Benchmark
Average build time for the same Redmine workflow on comparable machines, March 2026. Lower is better.
Benchmark run by Semaphore on one workload. Validate it on your own pipeline. Methodology and raw data โ
Config side by side
The same Node.js test pipeline in both tools.
.circleci/config.yml
version: 2.1
jobs:
test:
docker:
- image: cimg/node:20.0
steps:
- checkout
- run: npm ci
- run: npm test
workflows:
ci:
jobs:
- test
.semaphore/semaphore.yml
version: v1.0
name: CI
agent:
machine:
type: f1-standard-2
os_image: ubuntu2404
blocks:
- name: Test
task:
jobs:
- name: npm test
commands:
- checkout
- sem-version node 20
- npm ci
- npm test
Migrating
Install the sem-ai CLI, then ask your coding agent to map the workflow. Run both pipelines side by side before you switch.
$ curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/semaphoreio/sem-ai/main/install.sh | sh
# Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add semaphoreio/sem-ai
/plugin install sem-ai@semaphoreio
# Codex
codex plugin marketplace add semaphoreio/sem-ai
codex plugin add sem-ai@semaphoreio
# then ask your agent:
# "Move this CircleCI workflow to Semaphore and run both pipelines for comparison."
- Pick one representative project.
- The agent maps
.circleci/config.ymlto.semaphore/semaphore.yml. - Connect the existing repository.
- Run both pipelines in parallel and keep a rollback path.
When CircleCI fits better
- Your pipelines depend on many Orbs with no direct equivalent.
- Your team already budgets around CircleCI credits and the setup works for you.
FAQ
No. Semaphore connects to your existing repositories. Only the CI changes.
Semaphore publishes direct per-minute machine prices. CircleCI converts compute and services into credits, so resource class, storage, caching and concurrency all affect the cost.
In Semaphore’s March 2026 benchmark, the same Redmine workflow averaged 5m 01s on Semaphore and 13m 18s on CircleCI. It is a vendor-run result for one workload, so validate it on your own pipeline.
Yes, and we recommend it. Run both pipelines in parallel, compare speed and cost, and keep a rollback path until you switch.